Current Initiatives: WHCRA Legislative Amendment
Patients and Providers for Optimal Aesthetic Flat Closure
Women facing mastectomy deserve full disclosure of all of their reconstructive options, including aesthetic flat closure, and to have their informed consent respected.
Aesthetic flat closure is reconstruction of the chest wall contour.
Institutions support flat closure.
“…The consortium focuses on oncoplastic breast conserving surgery, nipple/skin sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and optimal flat closure after conventional mastectomy.“
Oncoplastic Breast Consortium
“aesthetic flat closure:
National Cancer Institute, Dictionary of Cancer Terms
A type of surgery that is done to rebuild the shape of the chest wall after one or both breasts are removed…”
Medical professionals support flat closure.
“Aesthetic flat closure IS a type of reconstruction and is a very powerful choice that deserves just as much care and respect as any other reconstructive surgery.”
Dr. Ron Israeli
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeon, NYBRA Plastic Surgery
“Patients deserve aesthetic flat closure.”
Drs. Jennifer Baker & Deanna Attai, ASO Author Reflections
“Many women have begun to embrace Flat Closure as a movement and a way of life. Flat Closure is a chance for women to accept their new, post-breast cancer bodies as both beautiful and valid.”
“I think ‘going flat’ just refers to removal of the breast and no reconstruction, and what it should refer to is removal of the breast, no reconstruction, and the surgeon doing everything they can to make it look nice and neat.”
Dr. Deanna J. Attai for the Breastcancer.org podcast
“We believe patients should be fully informed of all their breast reconstruction options, as well as the option of aesthetic flat closure (no reconstruction with a nicely-contoured, truly flat result). It is only once all the options are fully discussed, that patients can take part in a shared-decision-making conversation with their surgical team.”
Patients speak out
“My surgeon gave me a handout on going flat, along with the info about reconstruction, at my first meeting with her… She did a perfect job on my chest.”
― Anonymous
“It’s hard enough to have a double mastectomy due to breast cancer, but to have to fight insurance just to be able to look halfway decent and be somewhat comfortable in your own skin is wrong.”
April
“I knew I wanted to be flat from the very beginning [but] I was given a skin-sparing mastectomy. I did not consent to that outcome, nor did ever imply that it was anything I wanted. I am devastated.”
― Anonymous
Flat Denial: Why Does it Happen?
We face multiple cultural and institutional barriers to ensure that a woman’s choice to go flat is respected, every time. We now have clear language – aesthetic flat closure. But paternalism, protectionism, lack of a defined standard of care, sub-optimal prevalence of oncoplastic training for general surgeons, and an off-kilter reimbursement system are all pieces of the puzzle we still need to address.
FLAT Stats
75%
Three of every four patients going flat are satisfied with their aesthetic outcome.
“Going Flat” After Mastectomy: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Online Survey” (Baker et. al., 2021)
1 in 20
About 1 in 20 patients going flat – that’s a 5% risk for each woman who chooses flat closure – are subjected to intentional flat denial.
“Going Flat” After Mastectomy: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Online Survey” (Baker et. al., 2021)
Spread the Word!
#aestheticflatclosure
#putflatonthemenu
#notputtingonashirt
#blacklivesmatter
NPOAS stands in full solidarity with the Black community against racism & injustice. The right to bodily integrity is universal and all-encompassing, and there is no greater violation than the taking of an innocent life. (Learn more about BLM)
Work We Support
Nonprofit Organizations
Charise Isis’ beauty through mastectomy photography project.
Cancer Policy & Advocacy Team (CPAT)
CPAT provides cancer survivors and caregivers with tools and training that build upon their personal experiences to become effective advocates to improve cancer care.
Other Advocacy Efforts We Support
PODCAST
Stephanie Astalos Jones
An advocacy campaign to normalize bodies after breast cancer and to rethink cultural concepts of femininity.
The only magazine for the women “too young” for breast cancer.
Denmark’s Magical Uniboob and Queer Ninja’s visibility and advocacy work
Ngozi Ejedimu’s breast cancer awareness, visibility & support in Nigeria
Juliet Fitzpatrick’s visibility and advocacy project in the UK (also on Facebook)
Marie-Claude Belzile’s new book (in French) – deconstructing the cultural narrative about going flat. Purchase your copy here!
A blog about breast cancer and loss.
Insight and cutting honesty about this terrible disease from author and survivor Nancy Stordahl .
#aestheticflatclosure
#putflatonthemenu
#notputtingonashirt
Share This.
Tell us what you think.
About Us
Not Putting on a Shirt is a 501(c)(3) organization advocating for optimal surgical outcomes for women who choose to go flat after mastectomy.
Contact
Newsletter
REGISTERED CHARITY ID# 84-3021062
FAIR USE STATEMENT
This site contains copyrighted material. Not Putting on a Shirt’s educational materials and resources on this site are freely available for “fair use” (Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107) in accordance with our mission to advocate for optimal outcomes for those who choose to go flat after mastectomy. The copyrighted material on this site is distributed for educational purposes without profit – all donations to Not Putting on a Shirt directly fund our advocacy work. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond “fair use”, you must first obtain explicit permission from the copyright owner. Please direct requests or questions to info@notputtingonashirt.org.